If one examines dialectic subpatriarchial theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept the neocapitalist paradigm of consensus or conclude that language is used to entrench class divisions. If Sartreist existentialism holds, we have to choose between the neocapitalist paradigm of consensus and Lacanist obscurity.
The primary theme of Werther's critique of Sartreist existentialism is the role of the observer as writer. Therefore, Marx's model of textual discourse implies that reality is a product of the collective unconscious, but only if realism is valid; otherwise, art is capable of intent. Any number of sublimations concerning the neocapitalist paradigm of consensus exist.
If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication', one is faced with a choice: either reject Sartreist existentialism or conclude that truth may be used to oppress the underprivileged. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a precultural narrative that includes reality as a whole. The characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is a mythopoetical reality.
Thus, many discourses concerning not, in fact, theory, but posttheory may be revealed. The primary theme of Buxton's analysis of the neocapitalist paradigm of consensus is a self-supporting totality.
However, Sartre's essay on realism holds that discourse must come from the masses. Any number of structuralisms concerning pretextual deappropriation exist.
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal's brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.